On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 03:11:24 +0100
Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 18:26 -0700, ghaverla wrote:
> > But to read that a split of 49:51 means there can't be options is
> > disheartening.  
> 
> I was inaccurate, I guess there were much more than 51% pro
> sytsmed ;). But indeed, systemd caused the longest flame wars on
> several mailing lists I ever read + I participated to some of those
> flame wars.

The only flame wars I liked were the emacs/vi ones.

I was using slackware before they turned the tarball into a package.  I
can go back to that if need be.  I've used HP-UX, Solaris, QNX and
other things UN*X or UN*Xlike.  BSD would not be a problem.  Plan 9
might be interesting.

But the fact there are no options is what bothers me.

But, I have a friend a couple of thousand km away, who has a partially
borked system, and we are trying to talk him into getting things back
up.  So, I will come back to this later.

Gord


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140301200354.626156da@newmain.materia

Reply via email to