Gentleman, the exploits are unknown to you, not to the black market that supplies those investing in "not perfectly legitimate software". Should I quote stuxnet one more time or you took the time to read how it reached it's not-network-connected intended targets?
-- Gian Uberto Lauri Messaggio inviato da un tablet > On 11/dic/2013, at 17:22, Brian <a...@cityscape.co.uk> wrote: > >> On Wed 11 Dec 2013 at 09:11:56 +0100, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote: >> >> Brian writes: >> >>> We do not worry about serious, unpublicised exploits. Their existance is >>> of little consquence for your argument as your "attackers" would not >>> know about them. >> >> Are you kidding? > > About attackers being unable to take any significant action over > something they don't know about? Not really; its rather obvious. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131211162234.gj5...@copernicus.demon.co.uk > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/488a079a-d1ca-442f-83f5-49ea6837b...@eng.it
