Brian writes:
> We do not worry about serious, unpublicised exploits. Their existance is
> of little consquence for your argument as your "attackers" would not
> know about them.
Are you kidding?
> If what you are referring to is what I think it is then no machines were
> ever harmed. Not that the problem wasn't serious but the action taken by
> Debian was swift and exemplary.
Debian actions were swifts but no more that what was expected.
I just hope you are not in charge for Debian security.
--
/\ ___ Ubuntu: ancient
/___/\_|_|\_|__|___Gian Uberto Lauri_____ African word
//--\| | \| | Integralista GNUslamico meaning "I can
\/ coltivatore diretto di software not install
già sistemista a tempo (altrui) perso... Debian"
Warning: gnome-config-daemon considered more dangerous than GOTO
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/21160.7756.201710.795...@mail.eng.it
