On Tue 10 Dec 2013 at 23:50:00 +0100, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote: > > > > On 10/dic/2013, at 20:46, Brian <a...@cityscape.co.uk> wrote: > > > Quite possibly this is a technique which is tried but, in a default > > install, Debian does not provide any faulty services. > > > > You are never sure about not-yet publicized exploits.
We do not worry about serious, unpublicised exploits. Their existance is of little consquence for your argument as your "attackers" would not know about them. > And some time ago there was a problem with sone ssh code that > should not have been cleaned... If what you are referring to is what I think it is then no machines were ever harmed. Not that the problem wasn't serious but the action taken by Debian was swift and exemplary. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131210233905.gi5...@copernicus.demon.co.uk
