On Mon, 20 May 2013, Cláudio E. Elicker wrote: > On Mon, 20 May 2013 14:04:25 -0700 > Patrick Bartek <bartek...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > One would think from what is said in the mans that the -t option > > would do that. Don't know why it doesn't. > > > > Also, I just noticed a funny thing: Today, when I do 'apt-cache > > show libreoffice-writer' both the 3.5 and new 4.0 versions are > > listed. > > Same here. > > > Same output with or without the -t wheezy-backports. I'm beginning > > to think that the LibreOffice 4 packages have been moved out of > > backports, if they were ever there, and into the stable repos. > > Guess I'll have to find another package for my search tests. > > > > LibreOffice 4 packages are in wheezy-backports. Compare the results of > aptitude search -F"%p %v %V" '^libreoffice-writer$' > and > aptitude -t wheezy-backports search -F"%p %v %V" > '^libreoffice-writer$' and > apt-cache policy libreoffice-writer >
After making the above statement, somewhat facetiously, about LibreOffice 4 being moved out of backports, I did some additional searches similar to the ones you gave above, and discovered that LibreOffice 4 is indeed in backports. B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130520234746.60e13...@debian7.boseck208.net
