On Tue, 21 May 2013, Chris Bannister wrote:

> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 10:48:25PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > I tried that.  And a couple of variations.  I got the same output as
> > just using plain ol' apt-cache search. As part of the test, I
> > searched for an app version that I knew was ONLY in backports. It
> > didn't show up in the search. But I had to rush off and didn't have
> > the time to try anything else. Tomorrow, I'll try again, but be
> > more thorough.
> 
> Interesting. What is output of:
> root@tal:~# apt-cache policy "app version ONLY in backports."
> 

root@debian7:~# apt-cache policy libreoffice
libreoffice:
  Installed: 1:3.5.4+dfsg-4
  Candidate: 1:3.5.4+dfsg-4
  Version table:
     1:4.0.3-2~bpo70+1 0
        100 http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-backports/main amd64 Packages
 *** 1:3.5.4+dfsg-4 0
        500 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ wheezy/main amd64 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

B


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130520092612.70523...@debian7.boseck208.net

Reply via email to