On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 09:10 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > In <[email protected]>, Paul Johnson > wrote: > >On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 16:53 -0600, ghe wrote: > >> FORMAIL=/usr/bin/formail > >> > >> :0Hfhw > >> > >> * ^Return-Path: <[email protected]> > >> > >> | $FORMAIL -i "Reply-To: <[email protected]>" > >> > >> (Note that my name is in the Return-Path.) > >> > >> No addy editing, no buttons that don't exist on all my broken email > >> clients, and no surprises for others on the debian-user list... > > > >Wow, transparent reply-to-list for broken mailers: Very nice! > > It's not transparent. It's rare, but some users do actually set the Reply-To > header (and expect you to use it); this trumps their setting irrecoverably.
I bet that could be worked around. It's been a while since I dorked around with procmail for mailing list management (since gmane just does it better), I bet adding a second condition like... * !^Reply-To:.* to that rule.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
