In <[email protected]>, Paul Johnson wrote: >On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 16:53 -0600, ghe wrote: >> FORMAIL=/usr/bin/formail >> >> :0Hfhw >> >> * ^Return-Path: <[email protected]> >> >> | $FORMAIL -i "Reply-To: <[email protected]>" >> >> (Note that my name is in the Return-Path.) >> >> No addy editing, no buttons that don't exist on all my broken email >> clients, and no surprises for others on the debian-user list... > >Wow, transparent reply-to-list for broken mailers: Very nice!
It's not transparent. It's rare, but some users do actually set the Reply-To header (and expect you to use it); this trumps their setting irrecoverably. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. [email protected] ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
