On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 16:53 -0600, ghe wrote: > >> If this is official Debian policy, then why don't they set the > >> Reply-To > >> header to be the list? > > Hey, Man. It's Policy. Put something like this in /etc/procmailrc on > your mail server: > > FORMAIL=/usr/bin/formail > > :0Hfhw > * ^Return-Path: <[email protected]> > | $FORMAIL -i "Reply-To: <[email protected]>" > > (Note that my name is in the Return-Path.) > > No addy editing, no buttons that don't exist on all my broken email > clients, and no surprises for others on the debian-user list...
Wow, transparent reply-to-list for broken mailers: Very nice!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
