>Hello, that is apparently a long story if you start to read into it. It
>has somenthing to do with licensing and philosophy. As far as I can tell
The story has nothing to do with licensing or philosophy but with the missing
will for quality oriented collaboration with the Author.
The attacks against the cdrtools project started after I rejected to integrate
a patch into the official source because it did not solve the problem but
instead added bugs.
>from a user standpoint, the programs appear to be almost pin for pin
>from the command line as far as options and what not. Also if your sure
>that the device your trying to write to is a burner, I would create a
>symbolic link called "cdrw" in your /dev directory to that specific
>device file. It keeps the fudge factor down, and keeps you from
>declaring the device in your command. Or, wodim from trying to guess the
>device.
You do not need to play these silly /dev/ games if you use the original
cdrecord.
If you only have one drive (this should be the case for > 95% of all users),
simply omit the dev= parameter and cdecord will automagically find your drive.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
