On 2007-08-20 10:38:32 -0700, David Brodbeck wrote: > There are also maintenance issues with incorporating a complex > language that's under active development as a critical part of an > operating system. FreeBSD dropped Perl from their base system > because "base Perl" became such a pain to maintain. They were > essentially put in the position of having to fork Perl to maintain > any sort of stable target, and that was more work than they wanted > to take on.
I suppose they have their own sh. Because bash is also under active development (and has broken scripts several times in the past). -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
