On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:55:46AM -0700, David Brodbeck wrote: > > On Aug 20, 2007, at 9:46 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >> I suppose they have their own sh. Because bash is also under active >> development (and has broken scripts several times in the past). > > Yeah, FreeBSD ships its own, less featureful (but more compact!) version of > sh, with bash available as a port. /bin/sh is used as the standard command > interpreter. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /bin/sh > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 105740 Jan 11 2007 /bin/sh* > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /usr/local/bin/bash > -rwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 448996 Apr 18 16:27 /usr/local/bin/bash* > > Linux is the only *nix-ish OS I've used where /bin/sh and bash are > synonymous. ;)
This can be changed ;) ls -l /bin/sh lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 2007-03-23 02:30 /bin/sh -> /bin/dash Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
