-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 08:26:49AM -0400, Rich Johnson wrote: > I guess I'll be going back to 2.2 until this nonsense blows > over....sigh.
Why bother? Unless you're a corporate site, I really wouldn't worry about it (otherwise consult a lawyer). I reallly doubt anything is ever going to come of this. SCO, at some point or another, will have to put the code in question on the court record for inspection. I can very realistically see 2.6 not coming out of testing until this happens, though I don't follow LKML[1] to know what the current plan of action on this is. [1] Are there enough hours in the day to read both debian-user and lkml? I mean, I do almost noting on a quiet night at work and it barely catches me up on debian-user... - -- .''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian admin and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/HUq/J5vLSqVpK2kRAiiFAKDBKytiBTER3YKRIrbibeV3y+pq6QCg2rJ3 eClDK379bBUbb/WIDH0IhU0= =TE8T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
