On Tuesday 22 July 2003 18:42, cr wrote: > On Tuesday 22 July 2003 17:37, Sharninder Singh-662 wrote: > > > Do you suspect there could be a long enough delay between releasing > > > the alleged infractions and producing a clean kernel that fully > > > changing OSes could make sense, however? > > > > like u said .. if worst comes to worse. either ppl will develop patches > > and features for the latest hardware or some ppl might just shift OSs. > > FreeBSD gives most of the freedom of Linux though i'm not an expert on > > licenses and can't comment on the difference between the BSD and GPL, but > > i know that FreeBSD is already being used by BIG companies and linux is > > not exactly replacing it just existing beside it. > > Worse comes to worse .. hmmm .. makes me wonder ... i should pull out my > > FreeBSD disks again and try the f***** installation again. > > > > sharninder > > Cripes, Mickey$oft never managed to make me pay them for using Windoze, how > the heck are those turkeys at SCO ever gonna make me pay them for using > somebody else's operating system...? > > From what I've read, this is just SCO grandstanding. They're probably > just a puppet anyway, guess who's hand is up their butt? ;) > > cr
Damn! Meant to kill that. Sorry. I do realise that many of you are professionals running business systems and can't just ignore licensing demands as a private owner can. (My opinion of SCO's tactics remains the same though). cr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
