On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 10:06:26AM +0530, Sharninder Singh-662 wrote: > > > > If worst comes to worst and SCO finally show some incriminating code > > in 2.4, stepping back to 2.2 until the relevant bits are purged from > > 2.4 is all anyone should need to do to cover their assets in countries > > where this becomes an issue. > > ya .. very true and debian makes it even better by coming with a 2.2 > installation in the stable distro. itself. is 2.6 also affected by this SCO > claim ?
It can't be known if 2.6 will be affected until the specific claims are made public. SCO are still waving around a sealed envelope for anyone not willing to sign a rather nasty contract. IANAL, but I suspect the courts will force disclosure if Linux-related businesses approach the courts and demonstrate that they are being adversely affected by this. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
