-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/26/07 18:27, Paul Johnson wrote: > Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 01:39:40PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: >>> Andrew Sackville-West wrote: [snip] > Opening another can of worms, it seems like everyone would be a lot better > off if New Orleans was rebuilt further inland. "But it has all this > history!" So what! So did most Alaskan villages and towns prior to the
They are. It's called Baton Rouge. But then, the area where N.O. stands is a much better port that Baton Rouge, which is 90 mile upriver, and having a *large* port at the mouth of the continent's largest river is advantageous to everyone. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF5JXTS9HxQb37XmcRAmv3AJ4nKWElp01Kh6BZ098ZxEk0U5PF8gCfWJQg NTNSt88t8oWWR2wSiWvVpqY= =S/zn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
