Ron Johnson wrote: > On 02/27/07 18:01, Paul Johnson wrote: >> Ron Johnson wrote: >> >>> On 02/26/07 18:27, Paul Johnson wrote: >>>> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 01:39:40PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: >>>>>> Andrew Sackville-West wrote: >>> [snip] >>>> Opening another can of worms, it seems like everyone would be a lot >>>> better >>>> off if New Orleans was rebuilt further inland. "But it has all this >>>> history!" So what! So did most Alaskan villages and towns prior to >>>> the >>> They are. It's called Baton Rouge. >>> >>> But then, the area where N.O. stands is a much better port that >>> Baton Rouge, which is 90 mile upriver, and having a *large* port at >>> the mouth of the continent's largest river is advantageous to everyone. >> >> So put the port there and the city elsewhere. Kind of like how they do >> it >> in Alaska. Nobody lives in Prudhoe Bay, everybody lives four miles south >> on higher ground in Deadhorse... > > You really need to look at a map before spouting off.
I did. Where are you getting that I'm wrong on my geography on that one? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]