On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 07:44:02PM +0200, Sebastian Kapfer wrote: > On Fri, 04 Jul 2003 05:00:13 +0200, Michael Heironimus wrote: > > > Is anybody keeping score on how many different and unrelated font > > configuration systems we have now? > > Ermm... XF86Config... and fontconfig. What else?
I guess I'm not so much thinking of independent systems as of different places people have to look when something's not right. XF86Config, Xft, a font server if you run one, fontconfig for GTK2, and let's not forget gtkrc, KDE, and X resources. If you want to be anal there are also all those apps that use their own font configuration, like the Mozilla-based browsers. > My remaining GNOME 1 apps continue to work fine under GNOME 2. The bigger > problem is that the GNOME 2 development seemingly involved dropping as > many options/preferences as possible... :-( I hear you there. I'm waiting for GNOME3 to further improve usability by removing the ability to launch applications. As soon as you log in, it should just automatically start all of the applications that the GNOME developers think you should be running. After all, they're such experts on how everybody should be using their desktops. -- Michael Heironimus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]