John Kelly wrote: > > My statement is a simple if/then clause. It does NOT say "George is > near the bottom of the authority chain." I made no assumptions. But > if the shoe fits, you can wear it.
Ah well, you missed my point about customer service then (which was my point by the way - shame, I even put in a "==" and everything to make it more entertaining.) > You started this by saying your "experience" contradicts my "opinion" > to imply that I don't know what I'm talking about. When I said my experience contradicts your opinion I meant exactly that, word for word. If you want to read more into it then that's fine. It is not my place to look after your self-confidence issues. > You dispute my assertion that many users are so happy to have a spam > free INBOX, they won't complain about losing a few false positives. > Yet in the same email, you acknowledge that the number of complaining > users is very small. The number of _directly_ complaining users is small. I know well enough that for every one that does a good few more will complain up their chain of command instead (we are only a service provider after all). > Well then obviously, if the number of complaining users is very small, > then what I said must be true: many users won't complain. Such simplistic thinking - are you sure you know what you are talking about? (FYI this is more of a joke.) > George, if this is a debate, you're losing. In your opinion. :-p Best regards, -- George Borisov DXSolutions Ltd
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
