On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Jon Haugsand wrote:
> * Alvin Oga > > add soft to your mount options, so that the sytem can keep going > > vs using hard mount which waits for the remotefs to come back online > > - i rather use/risk soft mounts than to sit and wait > > in a hung state ... the pc is useless in that state anyway > > > > - and over the years, i've not seen any corruptions of files > > due to soft mounts ... lots of other problems though > > that is way worst than soft vs hard mount issues > > > > - and i only do soft mounts for my data, where i know its all > > saved and duplicated n-times elsewhere > > Thanks. Does this apply to smbfs too? yup ... to anything you mount c ya alvin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
