* Alvin Oga > add soft to your mount options, so that the sytem can keep going > vs using hard mount which waits for the remotefs to come back online > - i rather use/risk soft mounts than to sit and wait > in a hung state ... the pc is useless in that state anyway > > - and over the years, i've not seen any corruptions of files > due to soft mounts ... lots of other problems though > that is way worst than soft vs hard mount issues > > - and i only do soft mounts for my data, where i know its all > saved and duplicated n-times elsewhere
Thanks. Does this apply to smbfs too? -- Jon Haugsand, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.norges-bank.no -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
