also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.23.1828 +0100]: > i am thinking half-hour timeslots and stuff like this: > > madduck:2006-02-28:-1000:0 # sleeping still > madduck:2006-02-28:1000-1030:5 # okay > madduck:2006-02-28:1030-1500:3 # less preferred > madduck:2006-02-28:1500:9 # best choice > madduck:2006-02-28:1600-:0 # busy for the rest of the day
Maybe the system itself could also assign priorities to members. For instance, it maybe be very important for the "keynote speaker" to be there, so his/her priorities should themselves be prioritised. Also, if someone does not specify a priority for a timeslot, it shouldn't be 4, but rather NULL? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! love your enemies; they'll go crazy trying to figure out what you're up to.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
