also sprach Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.24.0341 +0100]: > A=list of people > B=1/2 hr time slots that all people can meet > C=number of contigous time slots for meeting > D=combinations of B that can satisfy C, where D < B > E=D where all people can attend, where E < D
He, looks good. > then what to do if E contains say 2 time slots, where slot1 total score > is say 2 and slot2 total score is 12 > > need 1 hour for meeting > 2006-02-20:1000-1030: total 2 > 2006-02-20:1030-1100: total 12 > should you schedule the meeting for 1000-1100? If that is the best choice, yes. I suppose this is case where individual importance comes in. If e.g. the project leader cannot make 1000 but 1030, maybe it's not a good choice; if just "some others" aren't there the first half, that's okay. Maybe it's too much to ask the tool to make a decision. Maybe it could just give a list of possibilities, sorted by the sum of products of attendants and their importance, and list the actual attendants and missing people for each to let someone make the decision? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! it is better to have loft and lost than to never have loft at all. -- groucho marx
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
