On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 08:13:31PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.23.1828 +0100]: > > i am thinking half-hour timeslots and stuff like this: > > > > madduck:2006-02-28:-1000:0 # sleeping still > > madduck:2006-02-28:1000-1030:5 # okay > > madduck:2006-02-28:1030-1500:3 # less preferred > > madduck:2006-02-28:1500:9 # best choice > > madduck:2006-02-28:1600-:0 # busy for the rest of the day > > Maybe the system itself could also assign priorities to members. For > instance, it maybe be very important for the "keynote speaker" to be > there, so his/her priorities should themselves be prioritised. > > Also, if someone does not specify a priority for a timeslot, it > shouldn't be 4, but rather NULL? I was just thinking if a USERID:DATE:TIME:PRI exists in 1 file and not in another then the file that does not have it will be given a zero score.
Here is an outline: A=list of people B=1/2 hr time slots that all people can meet C=number of contigous time slots for meeting D=combinations of B that can satisfy C, where D < B E=D where all people can attend, where E < D then what to do if E contains say 2 time slots, where slot1 total score is say 2 and slot2 total score is 12 need 1 hour for meeting 2006-02-20:1000-1030: total 2 2006-02-20:1030-1100: total 12 should you schedule the meeting for 1000-1100? cheers, Kev -- | .''`. == Debian GNU/Linux == | my web site: | | : :' : The Universal | debian.home.pipeline.com | | `. `' Operating System | go to counter.li.org and | | `- http://www.debian.org/ | be counted! #238656 | | my keysever: pgp.mit.edu | my NPO: cfsg.org |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
