>>>>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joseph A Nagy Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nick Hastings wrote:
snip>
>> Hmm? I agree that "reply to" should reply back to the origin of
>> the email. However the list is _not_ the origin of the email! The
>> original sender is the origin by definition.
> That is true. The original sender is the origin by definition, but
> that point of origin changes once the email is taken by the mailing
> list and distributed,
Hell no. The origin is still me. The list is a relay. relay !=
origin. Rerouting does not change the _origin_. Or why is the origin
of USENET article not the latest NNTP server (like, my inn box
sitting in the corner of my home office)? Or if your email goes to a
MX relay, does that become the origin suddenly? (By that logic, your
ISP's POP server is the origin, since that is sending the email to
your MUA).
May I suggest you run dict origin?
> therefor reply's should be sent back to the
> list (and no I haven't done that google search yet, I've been busy
> or offline until just now, and now I'm heading to bed so goodnight
> everyone).
manoj
--
He only knew his iron spine held up the sky -- he didn't realize his
brain had fallen to the ground. The Book of Serenity
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
