--text follows this line--
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joseph A Nagy Jr
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, that Reply-to-list functionality can be implimented on > the list itself.
Not without breaking the original functionality of Reply to
I don't agree. I think when you hit reply to, it should reply back to where the message originated from (in the case of mailing lists, I should be replying to the list, not the individual to first propogate the message).
> Why list-masters don't do this is so far beyond me
You should google for Reply to considered harmful to see the argument for that position.
Will do.
> that I don't even bother asking anymore (or complaining about it > when I have to fix it myself (by hitting reply all, removing the to > (which is the person who sent the message to whom I'm replying) and > changing the list from CC to to (very easy, but extra work we > shouldn't have to do)).
You need a better MUA.
Yeah yeah yeah. I'm really tired of the "you need a better OS" (WinXP only 'cause I haven't fixed my problem with the fs on my Linux box) and the "you need a better MUA" comments. We each use what we like. I LOVE Mozilla for mail and Pan for newsgroups. Both handle what I need them for exceptionally well (although when retrieving more then 5K headers from ng's with Pan, the system begins to lag).
manoj
-- Let me meddle not in the affairs of Linuxen For I am an idiot and will toast my boxen.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
