Anthony Campbell wrote:
>
> On 13 Jun 2001, Joerg Johannes wrote:
> > This might be an acroread problem. I have noticed that acroread for
> > Linux (and all other unices) displays text very ugly, but the windows
> > one shows them fine. So if you have a .pdf created with pdflatex (as I
> > do very often, because I need to print them out at university, and there
> > is no LaTeX :-(( ), it might look ugly on a linux (sun,sgi,...)screen,
> > but print out perfectly, and look good on windows screens. Have you
> > tried to look at one of your documents on a windows PC?
> >
> > joerg
> >
> > "Lewis, James M." wrote:
> > >
> > > I am using pdflatex to make .pdf files of a document. It prints just fine
> > > but looks bad when viewing with acroread. Is there some trick to using
> > > different fonts to make the screen display look good? I have tried
> > > using a couple of postscript fonts as well as the usual tex fonts (ccr).
> > > I have also tried ps2pdf with the same result. No problems with xdvi
> > > but I have to send this doc to windows users...
> > >
> > > tia
> > > jim
> > >
>
> I wonder if it has something to do with pdflatex. I've been making some
> latex slides using prosper and find that if I convert them to pdf using
> pdflatex the text doesn't appear when viewed with acroread. However, if
> I convert them via dvips and ps2pdf they do come out OK.
>
Hmm. I never used prosper, but according to the docs, did you use
\documentclass[pdf,...]{prosper}
and ran pdflatex with this one?
joerg
--
Did you know that if you play a Windows 2000 cd backwards, you
will hear the voice of Satan?
That's nothing! If you play it forward, it'll install Windows 2000.
