yip, I also run 2.4.20, with the Con Kolivas' ck2 patch, and without any problems.
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 01:23, Hugh Saunders wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 01:13:12PM -0500, Andrew Perrin wrote: > > Greetings- > > > > I'd like to use kernel 2.4.20 because (apparently) it drives my machine's > > built-in sound > > ref: >http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&threadm=20021218232653.45c6eac7.cgrimland%40yahoo.com.lucky.linux.kernel&rnum=6&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26q%3Dgigabyte%2Bga-7vax%2Blinux%2Bsound%26sa%3DN%26tab%3Dwg > > > > But I don't want to upgrade to testing or unstable in general. How crazy > > is it to do this? > why would it be crazy? woody ships with 2.4.20 > > i have used 2.4.20 since i installed woody using the bf24 flavour. > [i now use a 2.4.21-pre3 patched for acpi and even that is stable] > > used 2.40.20 on potato before woody and that was fine to. > > hugh -- Thomas Fogwill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CSIR - iComtek -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
