Lane Lester wrote: > > You are > correct that some folks, including John Hasler, asked me for details > privately.
Ummm, then how come I know about it? I've never communicated with JH. (Hint: maybe it wasn't private). > I agree that it would be better to do the whole thing on > the list in case others have suggestions or have similar problems that > can be solved by the interchange. > Yes. Already, Jonathan Chang is on the road to getting his problem solved, too... :-) I'm glad you took my suggestion in the spirit in which it was intended. Sometimes, things come across badly in E-mail, emoticons notwithstanding... :-/
