>> "A" == AJT60 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
A> On Thu, 5 Nov 1998, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
>> M$ had confirmed, that this document is a M$ memo. See slashdot for
>> the pointer.
A> Also, it's unlikely that this was deliberatly "leaked" by microsoft
A> (IMHO), because it's not exactly good publicity for them. Far more PR
I have not finished the Halloween II document, but the key quotes
alone make me think that *this* one was leaked by M$ because of the
DOJ case to show that there is immense competition and M$ doesn't have
a monopol.
This one is so positiv, if managers would read it, they would kick NT
at once.
Ciao,
Martin
