> I absolutely agree. While an X based version of dselect might be
> nice, what with the added utility of a mouse, scroll bars, and
> possible multiple windows, the text based dselect must have the same
> functionality and almost nearly the same ease of use.
> 2. Alternatively, let the non-error status messages overwrite
> each other.
> 3. Alternatively, show the non-error status messages in a
> separate window.
What U think about dselect showing a summary of the messages at the end of the installation which U could scroll or something. Why dselect has to produce error messages at all?? It should prevent errors in a way. Dselect has to become more intelligent and user friendly and allow an easy installation for a newbie too.
> C. Mouse option (and even X)
> 1. Let it optionally run as a gpm client. The mouse could be
> used to scroll (would scroll bars be appropriate even
> without the mouse?), expand headings (as with the folding
> editor), and toggle package markings.
> 2. Port it to X, with the same functionality as the souped up
> text based version, but prettier (in some people's eyes).
> Unix *is* user friendly -- it's just picky about who it makes friends
> with. Let's make dselect more sociable.