Hola.
Por favor disculpen el top-posting pero el resto está en inglés.
José Gregorio, Kete ya te indicó lo que dice en las FAQ y si seguimos el
hilo en la lista debian-security notaremos que lo que llevó a esta duda
fue un asunto relacionado con repositorios incompletos, de todos modos
creo que ya se aclaró el punto así que prevalece lo que dice en las
FAQ's y en las release notes desde hace algún tiempo a saber: "aptitude
is the preferred program for daily package management from console." O
sea, oficialmente aptitude seguirá siendo promovido por los
desarrolladores como el manejador de paquetes preferido desde consola.
Saludos.
Juan Lavieri
El 02/04/11 21:04, José Gregorio Díaz Unda escribió:
Hi Kete and thanks in advance for clarification.
So its not true "apt-get" is not recommended for "squeeze" machines?
Thanks again.
Joseph.
Enviado desde mi dispositivo movil BlackBerry® de Digitel.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: * Kete <k...@suddenlink.net>
*Date: *Sat, 2 Apr 2011 21:31:59 -0400
*To: *<xt4...@yahoo.com>
*Subject: *Re: aptitude upgrade vs. apt-get upgrade
Hi José,
You can find a reference at
http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-pkgtools.en.html#s-aptitude "aptitude
is the preferred program for daily package management from console."
This FAQ is also available as the package debian-faq which installs in
/usr/share/doc like lots of other helpful documentation.
Regards,
Kete
On Saturday April 2, 2011 8:24:24 pm José Gregorio Díaz Unda wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> Why is that?
>
> Where can we find source info about this recomendation?
>
> Joseph.
>
>
> Enviado desde mi dispositivo movil BlackBerry® de Digitel.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Riku Valli <riku.va...@vallit.fi>
> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:12:19
> To: <debian-secur...@lists.debian.org>
> Subject: Re: aptitude upgrade vs. apt-get upgrade
>
> On 03/31/2011 04:23 PM, Benedikt Hallinger wrote:
> > Hi,
> > i noticed that too and switched back to apt-get for that reason.
>
> Hi
>
> apt-get is now preferred method over aptitude at Squeeze. However at
> Lenny aptitude is preferred over apt-get.
>
> You should use apt-get with Squeeze and aptitude with Lenny.
>
> Regards, Riku
>
> > On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:49:19 +0200, Thomas Hungenberg
> >
> > <th+lists-deb...@demonium.de> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> since upgrading from lenny to squeeze, I've noticed several times
that
> >> aptitude
> >> does not install all available security updates whereas apt-get does.
> >>
> >> Currently, this looks like:
> >>
> >> # aptitude -s upgrade
> >>
> >> The following packages will be upgraded:
> >> bind9-host dnsutils libbind9-60 libdns69 libisc62 libisccc60
> >>
> >> libisccfg62 liblwres60
> >> 8 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not
upgraded.
> >>
> >> # apt-get -s upgrade
> >> Reading package lists... Done
> >> Building dependency tree
> >> Reading state information... Done
> >>
> >> The following packages will be upgraded:
> >> bind9-host dnsutils libbind9-60 libdns69 libisc62 libisccc60
> >>
> >> libisccfg62 liblwres60
> >> tex-common
> >> 9 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> >>
> >> What's the reason for this?
> >>
> >> - Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d97d799.6000...@gmail.com
