On 3/25/22 19:19, Leandro Cunha wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 4:19 AM Georgi Naplatanov <go...@oles.biz> wrote: >> >> On 3/25/22 03:24, Leandro Cunha wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 6:18 PM Georgi Naplatanov <go...@oles.biz> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 3/23/22 22:43, Leandro Cunha wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 2:33 PM Georgi Naplatanov <go...@oles.biz> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 3/23/22 18:35, piorunz wrote: >>>>>>> On 23/03/2022 15:41, Leandro Cunha wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please, take into consideration what is in the link and you can >>>>>>>> consult through >>>>>>>> it about CVE: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-5715 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Leandro, >>>>>>> I've been on this website before I posted with spectre-meltdown-checker >>>>>>> results. I have vulnerable status just like author of this topic. I am >>>>>>> on intel-microcode 3.20210608.2, and by the look of it, this bug >>>>>>> supposed to be fixed in: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "intel-microcode: Some microcode updates to partially adress >>>>>>> CVE-2017-5715 included in 3.20171215.1 >>>>>>> Further updates in 3.20180312.1" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So my version of microcode is 3-4 years newer than that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is it microcode problem, or spectre-meltdown-checker displaying wrong >>>>>>> information, or something else entirely? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I want to mention that on the same computer with kernel Debian 5.10.92-2 >>>>>> >>>>>> spectre-meltdown-checker >>>>>> >>>>>> reports that the system is not vulnerable to CVE-2017-5715 >>>>>> >>>>>> Kind regards >>>>>> Georgi >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This script is reporting an already patched CVE as vulnerable. >>>> >>>> >>>> Are you sure this behavior on 5.10.103-1 is not some kind of regression? >>>> What is the evidence that vulnerability is still fixed? >>>> >>>> >>>> Kind regards >>>> Georgi >>>> >>> >>> When replying to your email I was aware of the script issue that was >>> reporting >>> several already resolved CVEs as unresolved. As Salvatore sent the issue >>> link. >>> But it seems to me that this problem was solved 7 days ago, it would be >>> interesting if there was an update or a backport to stable. >>> >> >> Hi Leandro, >> >> I also think that an update would be nice. >> >> Kind regards >> Georgi >> > > I applied a patch from upstream and repackaged it from unstable. > And this CVE is displayed as resolved. >
Thank you, Leandro! I guess that the patch will appear in Debian stable (11.4), right? Kind regards Georgi
