Hi, On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 11:17:41PM +0200, Georgi Naplatanov wrote: > On 3/23/22 22:43, Leandro Cunha wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 2:33 PM Georgi Naplatanov <go...@oles.biz> wrote: > >> > >> On 3/23/22 18:35, piorunz wrote: > >>> On 23/03/2022 15:41, Leandro Cunha wrote: > >>> > >>>> Please, take into consideration what is in the link and you can > >>>> consult through > >>>> it about CVE: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-5715 > >>> > >>> Leandro, > >>> I've been on this website before I posted with spectre-meltdown-checker > >>> results. I have vulnerable status just like author of this topic. I am > >>> on intel-microcode 3.20210608.2, and by the look of it, this bug > >>> supposed to be fixed in: > >>> > >>> "intel-microcode: Some microcode updates to partially adress > >>> CVE-2017-5715 included in 3.20171215.1 > >>> Further updates in 3.20180312.1" > >>> > >>> So my version of microcode is 3-4 years newer than that. > >>> > >>> Is it microcode problem, or spectre-meltdown-checker displaying wrong > >>> information, or something else entirely? > >>> > >> > >> I want to mention that on the same computer with kernel Debian 5.10.92-2 > >> > >> spectre-meltdown-checker > >> > >> reports that the system is not vulnerable to CVE-2017-5715 > >> > >> Kind regards > >> Georgi > >> > > > > This script is reporting an already patched CVE as vulnerable. > > > Are you sure this behavior on 5.10.103-1 is not some kind of regression? > What is the evidence that vulnerability is still fixed?
See: https://github.com/speed47/spectre-meltdown-checker/issues/420 (Background of this is https://www.vusec.net/projects/bhi-spectre-bhb/). Regards, Salvatore
