debian-security  

Messages by Thread

• DebCamp 25 Security Tracker sprint - planning announcement Roberto C . Sánchez
• SHH Cipher recommendations and "prohibitions" from Debian? c . buhtz
  • Re: SHH Cipher recommendations and "prohibitions" from Debian? Bartosz Fenski
  • Re: SHH Cipher recommendations and "prohibitions" from Debian? Chris Boot
  • Re: SHH Cipher recommendations and "prohibitions" from Debian? c . buhtz
  • Use ~/.ssh/config Stephan Verbücheln
• Clarification Request: Acceptable Scenarios for Submitting CVE Fixes to Debian Fu, Rong (CN)
  • Re: Clarification Request: Acceptable Scenarios for Submitting CVE Fixes to Debian Salvatore Bonaccorso
  • RE: Clarification Request: Acceptable Scenarios for Submitting CVE Fixes to Debian Fu, Rong (CN)
• Upcoming stable point release: 12.11 Jonathan Wiltshire
  • Re: Upcoming stable point release: 12.11 Jonathan Wiltshire
• Open security issues affecting trixie which are not RC (2025-04-29) Moritz Mühlenhoff
  • Re: Open security issues affecting trixie which are not RC (2025-04-29) Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: Open security issues affecting trixie which are not RC (2025-04-29) NoisyCoil
• Testmail hste
  • Re: Testmail sylvain
  • Testmail Arne Pisch
  • Re: Testmail j V
  • Re: Testmail Álesson Nunes
  • Re: Testmail Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: Testmail Meso Security
  • FWD: Re: Testmail hste
  • Strange welcome after a testmail hste
  • Re: Strange welcome after a testmail Pierre-Elliott Bécue
  • FWD: FWD: FWD: Re: Strange welcome after a testmail hste
  • Re: FWD: FWD: FWD: Re: Strange welcome after a testmail Lupe Christoph
  • FWD: Re: Strange welcome after a testmail hste
• sbuscribe Francesco Buscaino
  • Re: sbuscribe Povl Ole Haarlev Olsen
• Upcoming stable point release: 12.10 Jonathan Wiltshire
• Re: Bug#1093650: Prebuilt binaries in QEMU source Heinrich Schuchardt
  • Re: Bug#1093650: Prebuilt binaries in QEMU source Michael Tokarev
  • Re: Bug#1093650: Prebuilt binaries in QEMU source Michael Tokarev
• Upcoming stable point release: 12.9 Jonathan Wiltshire
• Re: [DSA 5824-1] chromium security update Bjørn Mork
  • Re: [DSA 5824-1] chromium security update Santiago Vila
• (No Subject) Sergey S.
  • Re: (No Subject) Povl Ole Haarlev Olsen
  • Re: (No Subject) Sergey S.
• Securing Debian Manual, Out of Date? debianmailinglists . hz5zm
• Fwd: gnome-settings-daemon breaks existing usbguard rules, allowing all usb device by default jan kapoli
• Re: Bug#539352: /etc/init.d/mountkernfs.sh: Please mount debugfs when available in the kernel Mark Hindley
• I Joined This List David Campbell
  • Re: I Joined This List Jeffrey Walton
• dpkg MD5 David Campbell
  • Re: dpkg MD5 Jonathan Hutchins
  • Re: dpkg MD5 David Campbell
  • Re: dpkg MD5 Jeremy Stanley
  • Re: dpkg MD5 Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: dpkg MD5 Jeremy Stanley
  • Re: dpkg MD5 debianmailinglists . hz5zm
  • Re: dpkg MD5 Jeremy Stanley
  • Re: dpkg MD5 SZÉPE Viktor
  • Re: dpkg MD5 Jeremy Stanley
  • Re: dpkg MD5 Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: dpkg MD5 Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: dpkg MD5 Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: dpkg MD5 Simon Josefsson
• Upcoming stable point releases: 12.8 and 12.9 Jonathan Wiltshire
  • Re: Upcoming stable point releases: 12.8 and 12.9 Adam D. Barratt
• Recording for my DebConf talk about CVEs Samuel Henrique
  • Re: Recording for my DebConf talk about CVEs Sylvain Beucler
  • Re: Recording for my DebConf talk about CVEs Darren S.
• Latent bugs in armel, armhf packages built before t64 transition Chris Hofstaedtler
  • Re: Latent bugs in armel, armhf packages built before t64 transition Emanuele Rocca
  • Re: Latent bugs in armel, armhf packages built before t64 transition Martin
  • Re: Latent bugs in armel, armhf packages built before t64 transition Leandro Cunha
• bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record Guillaume Bienkowski
  • Re: bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record Lee
  • Re: bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record Salvatore Bonaccorso
  • Re: bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record Ondřej Surý
  • Re: bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record Guillaume Bienkowski
  • Re: bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record Ondřej Surý
  • Re: bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record Salvatore Bonaccorso
  • Re: bind9 update 9.16.50 -- too many record Guillaume Bienkowski
• Upcoming oldstable point release (11.11) Jonathan Wiltshire
  • Re: Upcoming oldstable point release (11.11) Adam D. Barratt
• Upcoming stable point release (12.7) Jonathan Wiltshire
  • Re: Upcoming stable point release (12.7) Adam D. Barratt
• Bug#1075786: znc.service restarts without warning on upgrade Jesse Rhodes
• Bug#1074468: RM: salt/oldstable-security -- RoSRM; removed from oldstable Jonathan Wiltshire
• Bug#1074467: RM: snort/oldstable-security -- RoSRM; removed from oldstable Jonathan Wiltshire
• RE: Mini-DebConf in Cambridge, UK - October 10-13 2024 Luna Jernberg
• CVE applicability Arul Anand MM
  • Re: CVE applicability Salvatore Bonaccorso
  • Re: CVE applicability Thomas Hochstein
• Upcoming oldstable point release (11.10) Jonathan Wiltshire
  • Re: Upcoming oldstable point release (11.10) Jonathan Wiltshire
  • Re: Upcoming oldstable point release (11.10) Adam D. Barratt
• Re: golang-github-disintegration-imaging: CVE-2023-36308 Nilesh Patra
• Workaround for the GSM privilege escalation vulnerability Stephan Verbücheln
• Re: RFS: paramspider package Samuel Henrique
• Re: RFS: assetfinder package Samuel Henrique
• security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique
  • Fw: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Meso Security
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Gian Piero Carrubba
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Gian Piero Carrubba
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Salvatore Bonaccorso
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Salvatore Bonaccorso
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Salvatore Bonaccorso
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Salvatore Bonaccorso
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Samuel Henrique
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Santiago Ruano Rincón
  • Re: security-tracker: A proposal to significantly reduce reported false-positives (no affected-code shipped) Salvatore Bonaccorso
• xz backdoor prevention and hosts.deny? Nick Sal
  • Re: xz backdoor prevention and hosts.deny? Gian Piero Carrubba
• CVE-2023-41105 not fixed in bookworm Richard van den Berg
  • Re: CVE-2023-41105 not fixed in bookworm Salvatore Bonaccorso
  • Re: CVE-2023-41105 not fixed in bookworm StealthMode Hu
  • Re: CVE-2023-41105 not fixed in bookworm piorunz
• Upcoming stable point release (12.6) Jonathan Wiltshire
  • Re: Upcoming stable point release (12.6) Adam D. Barratt
  • Re: Upcoming stable point release (12.6) Gian Piero Carrubba
  • Re: Upcoming stable point release (12.6) Joerg Jaspert
  • Upcoming stable point release (12.6) Jonathan Wiltshire
  • Re: Upcoming stable point release (12.6) Adam D. Barratt
• Upcoming oldstable point release (11.9) Adam D. Barratt
  • Re: Upcoming oldstable point release (11.9) Adam D. Barratt
• Upcoming stable point release (12.5) Adam D. Barratt
  • Re: Upcoming stable point release (12.5) Adam D. Barratt
• How do I help the project? Tiago Zaniquelli
• please help with python3-future removal Alexandre Detiste
• new redirects for www.d.o/security and www.d.o/lts/security Thomas Lange
  • Re: new redirects for www.d.o/security and www.d.o/lts/security Salvatore Bonaccorso
• Performance of security.debian.org? наб
• libssh CVE-2023-6004, CVE-2023-6918, CVE-2023-48795 Sean Whitton
• Handle jq CVE-2023-49355, which is equal to CVE-2023-50246 陳昌倬
  • Re: Handle jq CVE-2023-49355, which is equal to CVE-2023-50246 Sylvain Beucler
  • Re: Handle jq CVE-2023-49355, which is equal to CVE-2023-50246 陳昌倬
• Reaction to potential PGP schism Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Reaction to potential PGP schism Pierre-Elliott Bécue
  • Re: Reaction to potential PGP schism Joerg Jaspert
  • Re: Reaction to potential PGP schism Daniel Kahn Gillmor
  • Re: Reaction to potential PGP schism Christoph Biedl
  • Re: Reaction to potential PGP schism Meso Security
  • Re: Reaction to potential PGP schism Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Reaction to potential PGP schism Gioele Barabucci
  • Re: Reaction to potential PGP schism Daniel Kahn Gillmor
  • Re: Reaction to potential PGP schism Enrico Zini
  • Re: Reaction to potential PGP schism Cyril Brulebois
  • SOP migration (was Re: Reaction to potential PGP schism) Guillem Jover
• [arm64] secure boot breach via VFIO_NOIOMMU Bastian Blank
  • Re: [arm64] secure boot breach via VFIO_NOIOMMU Salvatore Bonaccorso
  • Re: [arm64] secure boot breach via VFIO_NOIOMMU Steve McIntyre
• Question about the status of libclamunrar9/libclamunrar and CVE-2023-40477 in debian buster aka oldoldstable Klaus Zerwes
• Upcoming stable point release (12.3) Adam D. Barratt
  • Re: Upcoming stable point release (12.3) Adam D. Barratt
• The recent RCE in libcue and tracker3 GNOME settings in Bookworm Konstantin Khomoutov
• libspf2 integer underflow Heiko Schlittermann
• Re: SALT Bastien Roucariès
• Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Bastian Blank
  • Re: Bug#1040901: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Ben Hutchings
  • Re: Bug#1040901: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Bastian Blank
  • Re: Bug#1040901: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Lennart Sorensen
  • Re: Bug#1040901: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Bastian Blank
  • Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Andreas Beckmann
  • Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Bastian Blank
  • Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Andreas Beckmann
  • Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages M. Zhou
  • Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Bastian Blank
  • Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Michel Verdier
  • Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Bastian Blank
  • Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Michel Verdier
  • Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Sam Hartman
  • Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages herve
  • Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Bjørn Mork
  • Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages herve
  • Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Bastian Blank
  • Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Robert Nelson
  • Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Bastian Blank
  • Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Sam Hartman
  • Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Russ Allbery
  • Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Bastian Blank
  • Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Andreas Beckmann
  • Re: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Bastian Blank
  • Re: Bug#1040901: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Bastian Blank
  • Re: Bug#1040901: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Bastian Blank
  • Re: Bug#1040901: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Julian Andres Klode
  • Re: Bug#1040901: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Bastian Blank
  • Re: Bug#1040901: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages Adrian Bunk
• Upcoming stable (12.2) and oldstable (11.8) point releases Jonathan Wiltshire
  • Re: Upcoming stable (12.2) and oldstable (11.8) point releases Jonathan Wiltshire
• Re: Bug#894081: closing 894081 Adam D. Barratt
• Old kernel versions cleaned out of packages list Adi Kriegisch
  • Re: Old kernel versions cleaned out of packages list Salvatore Bonaccorso
  • Re: Old kernel versions cleaned out of packages list Adi Kriegisch
  • Re: Old kernel versions cleaned out of packages list l0f4r0
• Setting APT::Default-Release prevents installation of security updates in bookworm!? Daniel Gröber

• Earlier messages