* Quoting Michael Stone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 10:06:45AM +0200, Rolf Kutz wrote: > >The script under scrutiny was intended for a > >laptop. A router or firewall setup is something > >different and should not route traffic with > >spoofed addresses. rp_filter should catch this > >easily, if you can use it. If not, an IP-based > >rule is ok, IMHO. > > No, if you mean to accept loopback traffic then you should accept -i lo. > If nothing else, all of 127.0.0.0/8 is loopback addresses, not just > 127.0.0.1, and I have seen software that makes use of that.
Locally, yes, but on a firewall or router? _And I was referring to 192.168.x.x addresses. - Rolf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
