On 2016-03-01 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> wrote: > On 01/03/16 20:25, Andreas Metzler wrote: >> nmu hugin_2015.0.0+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against >> libvigraimpex6" >> nmu enblend-enfuse_4.1.4+dfsg-5 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against >> libvigraimpex6" >> both hugin and enblend-enfuse were built (or binmued) against a broken >> version of libvigraimpex which shipped libvigraimpex.so.6 in a package >> still named libvigraimpex5v5. (#813415)
> I haven't scheduled the appropriate binNMUs yet because libvigraimpex isn't > built everywhere. Hello, I am aware of the transition, which is why I have waited two weeks before requesting the binNMU. However hugin and enblend-enfuse are only broken on the archs where libvigraimpex does build. So a straight rebuild would fix this serious bug, at the imho small cost that a later followup binNMU might be needed when libvigraimpex is ready. Thanks in advance for considering, cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
