On 06/05/15 23:51, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 05/03/2015 09:45 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 05/03/2015 09:08 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >>> On 2015-05-03 17:25, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >>>> We've had proj 4.9.x in experimental for some time now, and I'd like to >>>> move it from experimental to unstable as the first stretch transition >>>> for the Debian GIS team. >>>> >>>> Currently PROJ.4 4.8.0 is unstable and jessie, and PROJ.4 4.9.1 is in >>>> experimental. >>>> >>>> Updating PROJ.4 from 4.8.0 to 4.9.1 involves a SONAME bump from >>>> libproj.so.0 to libproj.so.9. >>> >>> Please go ahead; there are (currently) no entanglements. Thanks for >>> testing thoroughly in experimental. >> >> Thanks, I've uploaded proj 4.9.1-1. > > To resolve the build failures for postgis in hurd-i386 & mipsel, I've > manually bin-nmu'ed the packages on the respective porterboxes. > > The testsuite is known to fail on these architectures, using > DEB_BUILD_OPTIIONS=nocheck allows the builds to succeed. > > Since postgis (2.1.5+dfsg-1~exp2) for hurd-i386, and postgis > (2.1.6+dfsg-1~exp1) for mipsel, the testsuite is skipped on these > architecture via d/rules. Unfortunately these more recent postgis > versions are still stuck in NEW.
That got accepted. The current blockers are the cdo/ppc64el build failure (#763691) and the pdl/i386 one. Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/554c8161.4060...@debian.org
