On 05/03/2015 09:45 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 05/03/2015 09:08 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> On 2015-05-03 17:25, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >>> We've had proj 4.9.x in experimental for some time now, and I'd like to >>> move it from experimental to unstable as the first stretch transition >>> for the Debian GIS team. >>> >>> Currently PROJ.4 4.8.0 is unstable and jessie, and PROJ.4 4.9.1 is in >>> experimental. >>> >>> Updating PROJ.4 from 4.8.0 to 4.9.1 involves a SONAME bump from >>> libproj.so.0 to libproj.so.9. >> >> Please go ahead; there are (currently) no entanglements. Thanks for >> testing thoroughly in experimental. > > Thanks, I've uploaded proj 4.9.1-1.
To resolve the build failures for postgis in hurd-i386 & mipsel, I've manually bin-nmu'ed the packages on the respective porterboxes. The testsuite is known to fail on these architectures, using DEB_BUILD_OPTIIONS=nocheck allows the builds to succeed. Since postgis (2.1.5+dfsg-1~exp2) for hurd-i386, and postgis (2.1.6+dfsg-1~exp1) for mipsel, the testsuite is skipped on these architecture via d/rules. Unfortunately these more recent postgis versions are still stuck in NEW. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/554a8cce.2020...@xs4all.nl
