On 03/09/14 13:24, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Emilio, > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 12:44:22PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 02/09/14 07:23, Steve M. Robbins wrote: >>> The recent build failure of elastix (#759945) is caused by the >>> libhdf5.so path having changed, presumably due to #755539. The path >>> is encoded into insighttoolkit4-dev's file >>> /usr/lib/cmake/ITK-4.6/ITKTargets-none.cmake so Elastix will need a >>> binnmu as soon as insighttoolkit is rebuilt. >> >> It should build fine now, right? So why is the binNMU needed? There was a >> temporary problem on insighttoolkit4 that is now fixed, but no binNMUs on >> elastix or plastimatch should be needed AFAICS. > > So you mean simply closing the bug would be sufficient, right?
After verifying it builds fine now (which I guess it does), sure. Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54070198.3090...@debian.org
