Hi Emilio,
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 12:44:22PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 02/09/14 07:23, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > The recent build failure of elastix (#759945) is caused by the
> > libhdf5.so path having changed, presumably due to #755539. The path
> > is encoded into insighttoolkit4-dev's file
> > /usr/lib/cmake/ITK-4.6/ITKTargets-none.cmake so Elastix will need a
> > binnmu as soon as insighttoolkit is rebuilt.
>
> It should build fine now, right? So why is the binNMU needed? There was a
> temporary problem on insighttoolkit4 that is now fixed, but no binNMUs on
> elastix or plastimatch should be needed AFAICS.
So you mean simply closing the bug would be sufficient, right?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140903112406.go23...@an3as.eu
