On 02/09/14 07:23, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> The recent build failure of elastix (#759945) is caused by the
> libhdf5.so path having changed, presumably due to #755539.  The path
> is encoded into insighttoolkit4-dev's file
> /usr/lib/cmake/ITK-4.6/ITKTargets-none.cmake so Elastix will need a
> binnmu as soon as insighttoolkit is rebuilt.

It should build fine now, right? So why is the binNMU needed? There was a
temporary problem on insighttoolkit4 that is now fixed, but no binNMUs on
elastix or plastimatch should be needed AFAICS.

Emilio


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5406f106.9020...@debian.org

Reply via email to