On 02/09/14 07:23, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > The recent build failure of elastix (#759945) is caused by the > libhdf5.so path having changed, presumably due to #755539. The path > is encoded into insighttoolkit4-dev's file > /usr/lib/cmake/ITK-4.6/ITKTargets-none.cmake so Elastix will need a > binnmu as soon as insighttoolkit is rebuilt.
It should build fine now, right? So why is the binNMU needed? There was a temporary problem on insighttoolkit4 that is now fixed, but no binNMUs on elastix or plastimatch should be needed AFAICS. Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5406f106.9020...@debian.org