On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 16:00:29 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2013-02-23 Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> wrote: > > The plan seems ok to me in general. > > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 18:37:12 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > > > +# workaround for guile testsuite failure. > > > +ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_BUILD_ARCH),armel armhf mipsel)) > > > + DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS += --disable-largefile > > > +endif > > > + > > > Disabling lfs because of guile sounds fairly bad though, assuming this > > is what this does... > > As you do not ssem to be convinced, how about plan B: > > 1. Upload proposed packages. > 2. If armel armhf mipsel break due to --disable-largefile stop using > --disable-largefile there and stop providing guile-gnutls on these > archs. > OK I think I'm confused. How would you detect breakage due to disable-largefile?
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
