On 2013-02-23 Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> wrote: > The plan seems ok to me in general.
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 18:37:12 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > +# workaround for guile testsuite failure. > > +ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_BUILD_ARCH),armel armhf mipsel)) > > + DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS += --disable-largefile > > +endif > > + > Disabling lfs because of guile sounds fairly bad though, assuming this > is what this does... As you do not ssem to be convinced, how about plan B: 1. Upload proposed packages. 2. If armel armhf mipsel break due to --disable-largefile stop using --disable-largefile there and stop providing guile-gnutls on these archs. cu andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130317150029.gb3...@downhill.g.la
