On 2013-02-23 Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> wrote: > The plan seems ok to me in general.
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 18:37:12 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: >> +# workaround for guile testsuite failure. >> +ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_BUILD_ARCH),armel armhf mipsel)) >> + DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS += --disable-largefile >> +endif >> + > Disabling lfs because of guile sounds fairly bad though, assuming this > is what this does... Hello, it does set _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=32, to make sure that guile and gnutls-guile have the same structure size. See <http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3c878vntszm6.fsf%40gnu.org%3e> for a little bit of backstory. This sounds worse than it is, LFS is not really relevant for gnutls itself, the files it accesses are generally < 1 MB. (See [1].) Also gnutls used to be built with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=32 automatically until addition of some gnulib modules involuntarily enabled _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. Judging from the fact that 2.12.20 tarball does not include largefile.m4 I guess the configure option is not necessary in 2.12.20. - If you prefer to I can try without. cu andreas [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2011-11/msg00084.html -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130223183314.gd3...@downhill.g.la
