On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 06:00:18AM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: >On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 00:59 +0100, peter green wrote: >> The statement that all but one armel buildd is at the same location >> disagrees with >> the debian machines database. >[...] >> Metropolitan Area Network Darmstadt : arcadelt >> DG-i: argento > >They may still be physically located there, but: > >wanna-build=> select username, max(last_seen) as last_seen from >armel.users group by username having username like '%arcadelt' or >username like '%argento' order by 2; > username | last_seen >-----------------------+---------------------------- > buildd_armel-arcadelt | 2011-04-17 21:14:11.291825 > buildd_armel-argento | 2011-10-23 00:12:31.850723 >(2 rows) > >iirc they're only still hosted in case e.g. the ARM hosting falls over >for a prolonged period, but I'm happy to be corrected on that.
AFAIK it's something like that, yes. Again, we're expecting to add more v7 machines to the cluster in York soon-ish to help with this. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com Is there anybody out there? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120517121833.ga9...@einval.com
