On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 05:44:10PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: >Hi Steve, Hey Mike,
>On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:26:10PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> In terms of raw buildd CPU right now, I think we're doing OK, but >> memory is more of a limiting factor with bigger C++ builds. > >As maintainer of such a package that pushes buildds limits, I have a >question. >Isn't memory really only a problem when linking C++ with big DWARF info? Honestly, I'm not 100% sure where all the memory is going. I do know that at current rates of usage increase we'll struggle to link some large programs (like browsers) on any 32-bit platform soon. >Would it be worth trying to link with gold for these? It might be, yes. I can try that with iceweasel on an imx53 or Panda with 1GB if you like. Are there any non-obvious patches needed to the packaging? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com Getting a SCSI chain working is perfectly simple if you remember that there must be exactly three terminations: one on one end of the cable, one on the far end, and the goat, terminated over the SCSI chain with a silver-handled knife whilst burning *black* candles. --- Anthony DeBoer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120516155632.gd3...@einval.com
