Hello Luk, 2012/5/19 Luk Claes <l...@debian.org>:
> As everyone keeps claiming there is no armel buildd location redundancy, > I don't have much motivation to keep ancina running. It's ignored anyway. I sent you an email about it as well, ancina is doing d-i armel builds and currently armel is lagging a bit behind, we (armel buildd maintainers) would like to get the machine back to its builds unless there is some major reason for not doing that. Regarding redundancy, I think its something armel porters could work on, and Steve has said many times, he is planning to add armel buildds to the York cluster as soon as time allows. And if the worst happens, I am pretty sure Debian project is able to acquire ARM buildds easily as well as Debian developers interested on ARM might have enough machines to keep up with the builds. Regards, -- Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAODfWeESmoRFV8bjHUd1-1_dZ=g0g1xmjsgxvaeqcv-kgca...@mail.gmail.com
