Thomas Viehmann wrote: > Hi, > > according to #495663, roxen4 includes binaries without source (and other > not built from source). > Given that neither it nor its (absolute, i.e. fully broken when roxen4 > would be removed) reverse dependencies (libroxen-form libroxen-xmlutils) > have been in the last stable release or are terribly popular (roxen4 > popcon is 15 installs), I wonder whether the default option should be > removal from testing if this isn't fixed in a timely manner.
removal hint added Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
