Hi, > according to #495663, roxen4 includes binaries without source (and other > not built from source). > Given that neither it nor its (absolute, i.e. fully broken when roxen4 > would be removed) reverse dependencies (libroxen-form libroxen-xmlutils) > have been in the last stable release or are terribly popular (roxen4 > popcon is 15 installs), I wonder whether the default option should be > removal from testing if this isn't fixed in a timely manner.
Aren't you missing some reverse-deps here? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache rdepends roxen4 | grep libroxen | wc -l 83 As there's no roxen3 in the archive, it wouldn't make sense to keep them in the archive - removing them would also clean up the insane mess - having a package for every plugin is just crazy especially since a lot of the packages contain only one file. Imho it would be a good thing to clean this up. Best regards, Bernd -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer GPG Fingerprint: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
